Chinese Virus (CCP) Contradictions

Why are people convinced, despite numerous studies proving the opposite, that masks and distancing stave off the spread, why is there any need to limit how many customers may shop simultaneously? As the weather here in Canada is quite bone-chilling, isn’t insisting people (especially during the hour specifically allocated to those over 60 and those with underlying conditions) line up for periods of time, outside in the frigid cold counter intuitive?

  • Studies done over many years have proven masks do not stop the spread of viruses. Surgeons and nurses who perform clean surgery wear disposable protective masks. The purpose of the mask is not only to prevent germs from entering the patient’s wound from the surgeon’s nose and mouth, but also to protect the surgeon’s face from spray and spatter. Healthy people do not need and should not be forced to don masks.
  • As children are least likely to get this Chinese virus and if they do have a recovery rate of 99%, why are they forced to don masks, ‘social distance’ and our ignorant government about to force students to be tested using this corrupt testing, for Covid? This is so wrong and so invasive; I can only hope parents and teachers alike make enough of a stink that our moronic Premiere will be made to reverse this despicable decision. Also, closing schools, cancelling all activities and not even allowing children to play with friends or do anything outdoors is not only unnecessary, but is having negative effects which will impact their lives for years to come.
  • As a study of 10,000,000 (yes, that is 10 MILLION) people who were deemed asymptomatic proved the likelihood of them spreading the Chinese virus about 1 in 10,000,000, thus completely negligible.

     As the Chinese virus has a survival rates are as follows: 0-19:     99.997% 20-49: 99.98% 50-69: 99.5% 70+: 94.6%, I am curious as to why this new vaccine is being so hastily rushed to market, especially when I’ve read we still should wear masks, may need up to 7 injections and may still get the virus. This is unnecessary, untested and most of all, totally unwarranted. Here are some timelines of vaccines which were meticulously researched and tested; Typhoid, 13 years, Yellow fever, 19 years, and Polio, 21 years. Corona vaccine: under a year, and the Phase 3 (animal) testing is being done on we humans. There has obviously not been any long-term testing for efficacy or side-effects.

  • The late Kary Mullis, developer of the PCR test said emphatically this was not a diagnostic tool, as it gives up to 97% false positives. Why, then is this test being touted as the Gold Standard for testing? Not only that, but it is also being used in such a way as to guarantee the most positive outcomes when used on healthy people. A PCR test is amplifying samples through repetitive cycles. The lower the virus concentration in the sample, the more cycles are needed to achieve a positive result. Many US labs work with 35 to 45 cycles, while many European labs work with 30 to 40 cycles.

The research group of French professor Didier Raoult has recently shown that at a cycle threshold (ct) of 25, about 70% of samples remained positive in cell culture (i.e. were infectious); at a ct of 30, 20% of samples remained positive; at a ct of 35, 3% of samples remained positive; and at a ct above 35, no sample remained positive (infectious) in cell. In Canada, most labs set the limit of cycles to detect the virus’ genetic material, or RNA, to between 35 and 40 cycles, though some Ontario labs have “positivity” cut-offs as high as 45 cycles, according to a study first flagged by Westphalian Times. Mina, a physician, and epidemiologist, thinks the cut-off should be closer to 30. (The number of cycles to detect RNA is known as the cycle threshold, or CT value.)

This means that if a person gets a “positive” PCR test result at a cycle threshold of 35 or higher (as applied in most US labs and many European labs), the chance that the person is infectious is less than 3%. The chance that the person received a “false positive” result is 97% or higher.

  •  It has been proven that lockdowns cause more harm than good and there are far more people dying as a result of suicides, domestic violence, drug overdoses, loneliness, lack of treatment by doctors capitulating to politicians’ demands they only treat those with symptoms of having the Chinese virus. Doctors swore the Hippocratic oath which states first, Do No Harm! Why are doctors allowing themselves to renege on that oath, as they are doing massive harm when not treating people, and now they are expected to give unproven, experimental vaccines to everyone, consequences be damned.
  • Why, when modeling is not science but more like buying futures in the stock market, using outrageously inflated numbers of so-called cases to predict where there will be outbreaks next? This unscientific guessing game is the only thing being used by politicians, even in areas where no-one has been reported to be sick. And when putting in these wildly exaggerated and most erroneous numbers into their Magic 8-Ball, of course politicians are using this to justify lockdowns, masks, and untested, unnecessary, and unwarranted vaccines.
  • Why is it that we healthy citizens are being forced to isolate, not allowed to work, run their business or travel? Why aren’t politicians made to adhere to the very edicts they put into place to ‘stop the spread’ of what we know is seasonal flu? Was this a true pandemic, wouldn’t they be risking not only their own health but the health of others when travelling and attending/holding gatherings of much more than 5 people? Why, when they have been sussed upon returning from vacations, aren’t they given fines for thousands of dollars as are those who go to empty schoolyards to play basketball with no-one else around? Why indeed!
  • Why aren’t social media platforms investigating the truth behind this Scare-demic? Why are they complicate in spreading dubious material and presenting them as truths?  Why are they removing the facts about this virus as told by accredited scientists, virologists and doctors with years of scientific studies?   Platforms such as FaceBook and Twitter are denying factual, substantiated evidence by calling it misinformation, removing the posts and banning those who post the results of corroborated, peer-reviewed long-time studies which go against the lies being perpetrated by mainstream media at the behest of politicians and drug companies. FB, Twitter and others; DO YOUR DAMN HOMEWORK AND STOP BEING POLITICAL PAWNS!
  •  Why are these falsified numbers of so-called cases (I say so-called as a case is not someone who has been tested and get false positives. Cases refer to people who are actually ill and receiving treatment in or out of hospitals) being plastered all over the news both day and night if not to scare people into submission?

Also please remember we have the right to opt out of these experimental, untested, unnecessary and unwarranted vaccines. They have not been tested properly, as they have not had independent animal trials, were ready in under a year, and are labelled EXPERIMENTAL!!!! Refer to the Nuremberg Code; here are the first lines which outline this code, followed by the link to the entire code:

The ‘Doctors Trial’ (USA vs Karl Brandt) during the Nuremberg Trials following WW2, which established the Nuremberg Code regulating the ethics of medical intervention.

Some people might not be familiar with the verb “to dissemble”, but we all need to become familiar with it, because there is a lot of dissembling going on.

It basically means to deliberately conceal something or obfuscate it, so that one’s attention is misdirected or deflected from whatever the Dissembler wishes to obscure. Like the truth. And in this case, the truth about the Nuremberg Code and the protection it provides us from accepting any forced medical procedure or therapy at all. 

Nuremberg code will prevent you from having to accept the COVID-19 vaccine. |

For those who feel I’m being racist by calling this the Chinese Virus, here are 17 other diseases named after populations or places:

  • West Nile Virus

Named after the West Nile District of Uganda discovered in 1937.

  • Guinea Worm

Named by European explorers for the Guinea coast of West Africa in the 1600s.

  • Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever

Named after the mountain range spreading across western North America first recognized first in 1896 in Idaho.

  • Lyme Disease

Named after a large outbreak of the disease occurred in Lyme and Old Lyme, Connecticut in the 1970s.

  • Ross River Fever

Named after a mosquito found to cause the disease in the Ross River of Queensland, Australia by the 1960s. The first major outbreak occurred in1928.

  • Omsk Hemorrhagic Fever

Named after its 1940s discovery in Omsk, Russia.

  • Ebola Hemorrhagic Fever

Named in 1976 for the Ebola River in Zaire located in central Africa.

  • Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS)

Also known as “camel flu,” MERS was first reported in Saudi Arabia in 2012 and all cases are linked to those who traveled to the Middle Eastern peninsula.

  • Valley Fever

Valley Fever earned its nickname from a 1930s outbreak San Joaquin Valley of California, though its first case came from Argentina.

  • Marburg Virus Disease

Named after Marburg, Germany in 1967.

  • Norovirus

Named after Norwalk, Ohio after an outbreak in 1968.

  • Zika Fever

First discovered in 1947 and named after the Zika Forest in Uganda.

  • Japanese Encephalitis

Named after its first case in Japan in 1871.

  • German Measles

Named after the German doctors who first described it in the 18th century. The disease is also sometimes referred to as “Rubella.”

  • Spanish Flu

While the true origins of the Spanish Flu remain unknown, the disease earned its name after Spain began to report deaths from the flu in its newspapers.

  • Lassa Fever

Named after the being found in Lassa, Nigeria in 1969.

  • Legionnaire’s Disease

Named in 1976 following an outbreak of people contracting the lung infection after attending an American Legion convention in Philadelphia.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.