I am writing to ask, as this edict is unlawful and has no basis for enacting it, is it unreasonable to disobey it? I am wondering why there is only one Civil Rights lawyer in all of Ontario who has put together a class action suit regarding illegal lockdowns, masks, distancing, shutting down small businesses while allowing corporately owned businesses to open, many of which are depriving people exempt from masks their (our) human right to breath, police not upholding the law by defending people’s rights according to the Charter of Rights.
In order to declare an emergency, should not the government be required to prove the existence of said crisis? Year over year mortality shows 2020 was about the same as previous years.
Furthermore, violations of the Charter of Rights & Freedoms utilizing the Notwithstanding Clause, must be demonstrably justified. The Supreme Court of Canada has created what is now called the Oakes test to ascertain the validity of violations; that the benefits outweigh the negative impacts.
- the government must establish that the law under review has a goal that is both “pressing and substantial.” The law must be both important and necessary. (The government has not adequately established the necessity of enacting emergency measures)
- The court then conducts a proportionality analysis using three sub-tests.
- The government must first establish that the provision of the law which limits a Charter right is rationally connected to the law’s purpose. If it is arbitrary or serves no logical purpose, it must be struck down. (Such as requiring healthy people to wear a mask.)
- Secondly, a provision must minimally impair the violated Charter right. A provision that limits a Charter right will be constitutional only if it impairs the Charter right as little as possible or is “within a range of reasonably supportable alternatives” (Lockdowns have an enormous impact on all aspects of life, which are not reasonably justified given what we know about the mortality rate.)
- Finally the court examines the law’s proportionate effects. Even if the government can satisfy the aforementioned criteria, the effect of the provision on the Charter rights may be too high a price to pay for the advantage the provision would provide in advancing the law’s purpose. (Lockdowns have resulted in higher rates of suicide, drug overdoses, alcoholism, domestic and child abuse)
Outside the constitutionality of enacting emergency measures. The next issue to examine is the PCR test. It is not a diagnostic tool. The inventor of the PCR test, Kary Mullis was most emphatic about not using it for viral infection diagnoses. In fact, he stated that if you increase the cycle threshold high enough, you could find one of every molecule in the universe in a human sample. The following article explains the PCR test and why it should not be used: https://bpa-pathology.com/covid19-pcr-tests-are-scientifically-meaningless/
Over a cycle count of 35 (Ontario is using 40), the PCR test is estimated to give up to 97% false readings, which means the numbers being shown daily are highly inaccurate. That said, using those numbers to ‘predict’ where the next ‘spread’ will be is meant to make people believe the spread can be controlled, and attempt to justify lockdowns. Lockdowns Do Not Control the Coronavirus: The Evidence – AIER
And yet, all of Ontario is under this dangerous and completely unwarranted lockdown, unless of course, you happen to be a large, corporately owned and run business such as Walmart, Costco, Lowes and several others. How is it possible to not be in any danger in these stores, but all restaurants, gyms, small businesses are considered toxic environments? The answer is, Study of 10 million Chinese shows asymptomatic spread of CoVID-19 never existed: Post-lockdown SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid screening in nearly ten million residents of Wuhan, China – PubMed (nih.gov)
Decades of the highest quality studies show masks do nothing to stop the spread of upper respiratory viruses. They give people a false sense of security and can be dangerous if proper precautions are not followed. And it is highly unlikely people are following the advice regarding the risks, so the bottom line is masks are likely harming the health of people rather than keeping them safe. Here is a link to an excellent article that presents both sides of the argument. https://www.meehanmd.com/blog/post/173679/an-evidence-based-scientific-analysis-of-why-masks-are-ineffective-unnecessary-and-harmful
Are you wondering what science is being used to determine these measures consisting of lockdowns, social distancing and masking? This came from a high school student in the form a science project which was promoted by her computer modeler father and adopted as policy by the Bush administration, however it did not advocate lockdowns. It is not science, it is a model: Misguided Shutdown Policy Began as High School Science Project (townhall.com)
Those who suffer most during flu season are the elderly and people with underlying conditions. More children die from seasonal flu than have from CoVID-19. Also, when Hospital for Sick Children, in a press release, stated masks are unnecessary and dangerous for children, they were forced to reverse themselves; just as doctors are being pressured to declare CoVID-19 as the cause of thousands of deaths which were the result of other causes. This includes people being denied life-saving surgeries, cancer treatments and people, out of fear, delaying medical intervention until it is too late. Public Health authorities have neglected to advocate any prevention (prophylactic) or treatment measures, yet it is documented that Vitamin D can mitigate and perhaps prevent CoVID-19. https://www.healthline.com/health-news/vitamin-d-can-help-reduce-covid19-risks
CoVID-19 has been shown to be treatable with readily available drugs and supplements: Treatments for COVID-19 – Harvard Health.
You may be asking the reasons behind falsifying data, demanding people wear masks (including employees forced to wear masks for hours while working,) social distancing and lockdowns. I have never been a conspiracy believer, but there are times when there is a conspiracy if only by complicit actions, and this is one of those times: Globalists Openly Admitting To Population Control Agenda: Globalists Openly Admitting To Population Control Agenda (technocracy.news)
Belarusian President Claims IMF & World Bank Offered him a Bribe to Impose COVID Restrictions –
Belarusian President Aleksandr Lukashenko said last month via Belarusian Telegraph Agency, BelTA., that World Bank and IMF offered him a bribe of $940 million USD in the form of “Covid Relief Aid.” In exchange for $940 million USD, the World Bank and IMF demanded that the President of Belarus:
• imposed “extreme lockdown on his people”
• force them to wear face masks
• impose very strict curfews
• impose a police state
• crash the economy
Belarus President Aleksandr Lukashenko REFUSED the offer and stated that he could not accept such an offer and would put his people above the needs of the IMF and World Bank. This is NOT a conspiracy. You may research this yourself. He actually said this!
Now IMF and World Bank are bailing out failing airlines with billions of dollars, and in exchange, they are FORCING airline CEOs to implement VERY STRICT POLICIES such as FORCED face masks covers on EVERYONE, including SMALL CHILDREN, whose health will suffer as a result of these policies.
And if it is true for Belarus, then it is true for the rest of the world! The IMF and World Bank want to crash every major economy with the intent of buying over every nation’s infrastructure at cents on the dollar!
If you want to save your business(es) from bankruptcy, I implore you to not wait for this fraud to come before the courts, but to open your business immediately. Once it has been determined in court that lockdowns are illegal, any fines incurred are like fruit from the poisonous tree and will be dismissed. Many are crowdfunding so they can afford a lawyer to fight these erroneous fines. Details emerge of lawsuit over government’s coronavirus response (theworldnews.net)
Which is worse; getting a fine you almost assuredly will not have to pay, or losing your business forever?