September 27, 2016 By Stella Morabito

If you can’t ask a candid question of a professor or fellow students without fear of retribution, you aren’t in a place of learning. That’s because real knowledge can be fueled only by free and open inquiry.

The process of learning for the high school or college student is the same as it is for a child: a give-and-take with others through which we verify reality by asking straightforward questions of varying complexity. The more open and free the exchange, the greater our knowledge and awareness of what is true.

Political correctness, however, is by nature deceptive and psychologically manipulative. It therefore serves as a major roadblock to inquiry, as do all other forms of propaganda.


We need to fight propaganda constantly, fearlessly, and shrewdly if we want to preserve our ability to learn and to think independently. Deception is the key ingredient of propaganda, but it is always seasoned with the lure of truth, or half-truths.

But first we have to learn to recognize propaganda. I define it this way: propaganda is the process of psychological manipulation by which power elites—politicians, academics, marketers, media players, celebrities, and so on—condition people to adapt to an agenda.

Propagandists deploy this process in three basic stages. First, they lay the groundwork for conditioning by impeding independence and clarity of thought. Second, as many people become more conditioned and isolated from each other, propagandists can reshape and mobilize them into masses who agitate for the agenda. The final stage is the enforcement of conformity across the board. In the end, propaganda amounts to mind hacking. (You can read more about this in my Federalist articles “How to Escape the Age of Mass Delusion” and “Ten Resources to Hack Proof Your Mind.”)

The common denominator of agenda items enforced by political correctness—from Common Core to gender politics to climate change and down the list—ends up being the consolidation of state power, or the power of elites.


With rare exceptions, college campuses have become propaganda-saturated environments. But even off-campus, there is little relief from the climate of political correctness that stunts independent thought. Hollywood, the media, and the Internet are all heavy movers of propaganda.

In response I’ve compiled a list to help you sort fact from fiction whenever you are stumped by a questionable assertion or an uneasy situation—whether in the classroom, on social media, in your neighborhood, or at a party. Stop and ask yourself the following. Any “yes” answer means you are being manipulated by propaganda.


Is your natural curiosity being suppressed? Whether the debate is about global warming or gender-neutral bathrooms, or anything else, if you have a nagging question or concern that is being cut off or shouted down, this is a clear sign you are being force-fed propaganda.


Are you being threatened with slurs or labels? Might you risk being called “bigot” or “hater” or “flat-earther” or worse if you simply express a personal preference? If so, you are in propaganda territory. Name-calling serves two purposes for propagandists: (1) it shuts down free inquiry and debate, and (2) it psychologically manipulates you through a fear of being “tarred-and-feathered.”


Do you feel you will be ostracized if you ask a question or express a politically incorrect view? The threat of ostracism is probably the oldest manipulative trick in aid of mind control. We are hardwired from infancy to avoid social isolation, which is why peer pressure is such a powerful force. This is also why solitary confinement is among the most dreaded of punishments. Political correctness depends on inciting the primal human fear of loneliness.


Do you notice a “herd effect” as people shift their opinions to adapt to a politically correct opinion? When others don’t feel comfortable having a real conversation with you, you’re living in a propaganda stew. Perhaps you see a classmate whom you were able to chat with earlier in the year but who has “evolved” with the program to the point that you can’t talk earnestly anymore. Maybe you notice how another classmate is excessively tentative in her speech and tone, a precautionary measure to avoid saying something “unacceptable.”


Are you being pigeonholed as a result of your question or opinion? Today’s propaganda often deconstructs your humanity by way of a scorecard that rates your level of privilege or oppression, based on skin color, class, family make-up, sexuality, “gender identity,” and a whole host of “intersectionality” components. Sadly, officials who promote “diversity and equality” are trained to ignore your humanity as an integrated individual so they can view you as a composite of bits and pieces of identity politics.


Do you sense that if you express ideas freely, you will be labeled a nutcase? Do you sense relational aggression at play? Gaslighting is a form of psychological abuse that is used by wife beaters as well as cult leaders. It is a natural byproduct of unchecked propaganda, too. The tactics of gaslighting are basically twofold. First, to get you to doubt your sanity, or at least get you to think you are utterly alone in your perceptions of the world. (Consider the constant use of the term phobia by today’s propagandists.) Second, gaslighters make a point of regulating and controlling the personal relationships of their victims so they feel even more isolated and dependent.


Will others be “triggered” by your opinion? If so, you are likely in a propaganda pocket: an “inquiry-free zone.” Emotional maturity has a lot to do with an individual’s ability to adapt. But propagandists see such maturity as a threat to their agendas. In fact, anything that enhances friendship or real understanding gets in the way of propaganda. Those who are “triggered” by a different opinion—who shut down emotionally by it—tend to be both the victims and the purveyors of propaganda.


Are you expected to trade in reality to prop up somebody’s illusion? One common example is the requirement that you adhere to pronoun protocols, even those that insist you refer to an individual with the plural pronouns they and them. This is a prime example of propaganda messing with your mind by messing with everybody’s language. No common language, no common reality, no communication. People end up even more isolated, unmoored in alternative realities that destabilize a sense of self.


Are you tempted to self-censor to avoid social punishment? Or are you tempted to falsify what you believe to gain social rewards? These two reactions build something called a “spiral of silence” that facilitates propaganda by creating the illusion of an opinion shift. It separates and isolates those who hold the politically incorrect opinion by inducing them—through fear of social rejection—to engage in self-censorship or to pretend to be on board with the program.


Do you sometimes feel like you’re stuck in a cult? Unchecked propaganda is cultlike in nature because it suppresses free inquiry and pushes utter conformity of thought. It also incorporates a lot of features of cults, including the use of deception, psychological manipulation, behavior modification, mind-hacking, divide-and-conquer tactics, social polarization, relational aggression, gaslighting, language control, and much more.

Perhaps the best way of fighting propaganda is one friendly conversation at a time. As Jacques Ellul wrote in his classic 1965 book Propaganda: The Formation of Men’s Attitudes, “Propaganda ends where simple dialogue begins.”

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Millions are dead worldwide thanks to Dr. Fauci’s & Gilead Sciences, a US biotechnology company.

WHO-sponsored preliminary review indicates Ivermectin effectiveness.

 April 1, 2021

In this article originally published by Swiss Policy Research on December 31, 2020, we see a public presentation given by Dr. Andrew Hill. Dr. Hill is the spearhead of a World Health Organization (WHO)-sponsored meta-analysis of randomized control trials of Ivermectin for the treatment of symptomatic COVID-19. Based on Dr. Hill’s preliminary results, he found that the use of Ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19 resulted to a highly significant 83% reduction in COVID mortality.

Dr. Hill also found that Ivermectin drastically reduced viral clearance time, faster recovery (discharge) time.

The meta-analysis was concluded on January 20, 2021 showing a result of 75% reduction in COVID mortality. The data does not include results in ambulatory and prophylactic treatment.

Visit the original link to view the 12-minute presentation by Dr. Hill.

Editor’s Note: This article is for the detractors of Ivermectin who insist that there is no proof showing the effectiveness and safety of the drug for COVID-19. We simply cannot understand how these people, some of whom are doctors, can simply write off Ivermectin when many people are suffering.

Even though the results of this study will still need to be confirmed by a large-scale clinical trial, we can say with confidence that resource-deprived countries like the Philippines need to start using Ivermectin, as soon as possible. Delaying the widespread use of this drug is irresponsible, especially with our hospitals getting overwhelmed by mild COVID cases, while patients suffering from more serious illnesses are being turned away. Ivermectin can help us unclog our ailing health care system and ease the panic among our people.

So, now we must ask ourselves, why didn’t Dr. Fauci recommend this instead of Remdesivir, which has been proven totally ineffective? Could it be he is in bed with biopharmaceutical company Gilead Sciences? Remdesivir is administered via injection into a vein. During the COVID-19 pandemic, Remdesivir was approved or authorized for emergency use to treat COVID‑19 in around 50 countries.

interview with Dr. Hill, re: Ivermectin vs Remdesivir at DuckDuckGo

Fauci’s Remdesivir: Inadequate to Treat COVID-19 and Potentially Lethal

An Analysis of the Science and Politics

By Peter R. Breggin, MD and Ginger Ross Breggin
May 14, 2020

We have found that Remdesivir is a failed antiviral drug that will probably do more harm than good for many coronavirus patients. An earlier Remdesivir trial for Ebola was stopped because the drug was causing significantly higher mortality rates than other antiviral drugs in the same trial. As one recent medical source noted, the Remdesivir Ebola trial had to be aborted “because of an increase in death among patients taking it, meaning it did not help those patients”. 

Remdesivir is not a specific anti-COVID-19 drug, as many people think. It is a general antiviral drug with a history of earlier failures, as well as adverse effects serious enough to kill patients. Dr. Anthony Fauci should never have made it his frontrunner for drugs desperately needed to treat the pandemic. We will describe very recent scientific data confirming these conclusions.

Fauci Cancels the NIH Remdesivir Trial for COVID-19

Dr. Fauci—Director of the NIH Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases—has clandestinely cancelled NIH’s Remdesivir trial while he continues to audaciously promote the drug. Fauci signaled the end of the clinical trial when he announced that he had broken the double-blind by informing patients in the placebo group that they were not getting the antiviral drug Remdesivir and allowing them to switch to taking it. In an interview, Fauci said that the results of the Remdesivir trial were so promising, there was “an ethical obligation to immediately let the placebo group know so they can have access” to the drug.

Fauci had no ethical responsibility to break the double-blind to allow the placebo patients to get treatment. The drug was not saving lives, it has serious adverse effects from earlier trials, and its meager results were very disappointing and controversial. It is far more likely that he was ending the trial to cover up the disaster. In saving face for himself and the drug company, Fauci may have needlessly endangered the lives of the placebo patients by unleashing Remdesivir upon them.

Like Tearing Up the Remdesivir Study in Front of Our Eyes

When Fauci announced he had broken the double-blind for his highly promoted Remdesivir study, he basically tore up the study in front of our eyes, while telling us to take his word for everything. His actions left us wondering if he is hiding that Remdesivir for COVID-19 is as disappointing and dangerous a failure as it was for Ebola. While touting the alleged positive results for Remdesivir, Fauci has failed to announce the adverse effects profile. We simply do not know how dangerous the drug has proven to be in the aborted trial.

By breaking the double-blind, Fauci invalidated the NIH Remdesivir study. We will never know what its conclusions would have looked like. Fauci’s Remdesivir clinical trial will not even be eligible for publication in a reputable journal. Similarly, without the double-blind, the study could not have gained legitimate FDA approval if going through the agency’s normal approval process.

Once the double blind was broken, patients and researchers learned who was taking the medication and who was not. This turned Fauci’s “gold standard” clinical trial into the weakest kind of study, an open observational study—one in which highly biased researchers and analysts, such as Fauci, manipulate the unblinded data and offer their subjective opinions.

This is the study and the miracle drug that Fauci so highly touted two weeks ago, declaring “This will be the standard of care,” proving “that a drug can block this virus.” Now Fauci’s research is essentially worthless, except for the serious doubts it raises about the drug’s hidden safety profile.

Remdesivir Clinical Trial Published in Lancet Finds No Benefit and Very Serious Adverse Effects

Shortly before Fauci began touting his flawed and now-terminated study, strong peer-reviewed evidence from a genuine double-blind study was published indicating that Remdesivir is both useless and dangerous in treating COVID-19. Together with the failed Ebola Remdesivir trial, this new publication gives us two controlled clinical trials showing that Remdesivir is probably doing more harm than good when treating viruses.

The recent multi-centered clinical trial was published in the world’s oldest and most prestigious journal, Lancet. In the study, Remdesivir not only failed to demonstrate clinical improvement in COVID-19 patients, it inflicted potentially fatal adverse reactions on the patients in the form of increased damage to the lungs. Fauci may be killing unwitting patients by encouraging them, as he has done, to switch to the experimental and dangerous Remdesivir.

The multi-center controlled clinical trial published in Lancet found Remdesivir ineffective. It was devoid of any statistically significant clinical improvements.

Interpretation In this study of adult patients admitted to hospital for severe COVID-19, Remdesivir was not associated with statistically significant clinical benefits. (p. 1, bold in original).

In addition, despite the encouraging findings in non-clinical models, they found no antiviral effect for the drug in human patients:

Remdesivir did not result in significant reductions in SARS-CoV-2 RNA loads or detectability in upper respiratory tract or sputum specimens in this study.(p. 9)

Most importantly, Remdesivir produced very severe adverse reactions in the form of “respiratory failure” or “acute respiratory distress syndrome” in 5% of patients. In other words, 5 of every 100 patients taking Remdesivir developed a life-threatening decline in their condition. The drug made their disease worse! This echoes the findings of the disastrous Remdesivir Ebola trial.

Here is the Lancet study summary of adverse events serious enough to cause discontinuation of Remdesivir:

More patients in the Remdesivir group than the placebo group discontinued the study drug because of adverse events or serious adverse events (18 [12%] in the Remdesivir group vs four [5%] in the placebo group), among whom seven (5%) were due to respiratory failure or acute respiratory distress syndrome in the Remdesivir group. (p. 10)

Although the researchers were based in China, the publication of their scientific report had to pass the more rigorous Western standards imposed by the Lancet. By contrast, Fauci’s NIH Remdesivir study has not passed peer review or been published anywhere—and because the double-blind has been broken, it should never be published in a legitimate journal. Now that Fauci has aborted it, scientists around the world will never know its real outcome. Instead, we are asked to take its meager, manipulated positive results on faith from Fauci without being told about its adverse event profile.

The study in Lancet was funded by numerous sources, including the Chinese government, the British government, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and by a drug company other than Gilead. Confirming Fauci’s biases, his Institute did not provide funding.

The gullible media has fawned over the NIH/NIAID press release of its unfinished, unpublished and aborted study on Remdesivir while largely ignoring the completed Remdesivir Chinese study in Lancet which found no statistically significant positive results for the drug and a very high rate of serious adverse effects.

Supporting an Unproven Financial Blockbuster Drug Over the Tried and True

As the Director of the NIH’s Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Fauci has been brimming over with enthusiasm for his clinical trial for Remdesivir, claiming in advance that it was the greatest hope for stemming the epidemic coronavirus. At the same time, he has publicly criticized President Trump for promoting hydroxychloroquine without scientific clinical trials. This is a remarkable double standard.

Clearly, Fauci is a man on a mission—a mission to suppress one drug and to promote another. Because of Fauci, Trump has been ridiculed in the media for promoting hydroxychloroquine, an old and inexpensive drug with a great safety record in which he has no personal interest. But Fauci’s personal and professional interests drive him to promote a relatively untried experimental drug with two previously bad outcomes, including no clinical benefit and serious adverse effects.

Fauci chastised President Trump for showing enthusiasm for hydroxychloroquine in the absence of controlled clinical trials; but Fauci did nothing to conduct those much-needed trials. Instead, he rushed to sponsor Remdesivir, and to boast about it, in the face of two existing negative clinical trials and before the drug had any positive clinical trials.

Fortunately, there are other physicians and scientists both in the news and on Twitter, who have spotted that Fauci is untrustworthy in his handling of the trials. Nonetheless, because of the way the media are hyping Remdesivir, and with the fervent support of both NIH and the FDA, a new “blockbuster” drug is being created out of nothing. Remdesivir has little hope of genuinely helping people; and it can cause increased inflammation of the lung. However, unless the political tide turns on Fauci, Remdesivir remains guaranteed to further enrich and empower the pharmaceutical empire and those who prosper within it, such as Anthony Fauci.

Remdesivir: A Cascading Failure from the Beginning

Fauci has been manipulating the Remdesivir trials from the beginning. One example was highlighted by a May 1, 2020 headline in The Washington Post: “Government researchers changed metric to measure coronavirus drug Remdesivir during clinical trial.” 

Government clinical trial investigators changed the primary metric for measuring the success of Gilead’s experimental drug Remdesivir as a coronavirus treatment two weeks before Anthony S. Fauci’s announcement that the drug would be the new “standard of care.”

When clinical trials are begun, the researchers are required to establish the “endpoints,” including a “primary endpoint,” which is the major measure of outcome and the main criterion for success. This is what The Washington Post was referring to as the metrics. The endpoints for Remdesivir are listed in the original plan for the trials called the protocols. These initial endpoints for proving the success of Remdesivir included truly meaningful criteria, such as the all-important lowered fatality rate and complete recovery. 

Fauci Redefines Recovery to Included People Partially Disabled and Living at Home on Oxygen

As the trial continued, it must have become apparent to Fauci that his drug was not going to reduce mortality or even lead to complete recovery. When all the meaningful criteria for success were dropped, the one primary marker for success became “time to recovery”—except recovery included patients who remained hospitalized or who were at home requiring limitations on their activities and/or requiring oxygen. Here are the official criteria for “success”:  

1. Time to recovery [Time Frame: Day 1 through Day 29 ]

Day of recovery is defined as the first day on which the subject satisfies one of the following three categories from the ordinal scale: 1) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen – no longer requires ongoing medical care; 2) Not hospitalized, limitation on activities and/or requiring home oxygen; 3) Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities.

What Fauci masterminded is so unbelievable that it needs repeating. Not only did recovery time become the single primary criterion for improvement, “recovery” was achieved even with the patient remaining in the hospital or returning home with limited activities and/or requiring oxygen. The miracle drug, by sleight of Fauci’s hand, had been surreptitiously reduced to a second-rate treatment that statistically does not save lives or lead to complete recovery.

Fauci’s NIH press release estimated that Remdesivir shortened the recovery time for the COVID-19 illness by a mere four days (from 15 to 11). But as inadequate as that sounds for a wonder drug’s only achievement, it looks ridiculous when realizing that Fauci still had to reinvent the concept of recovery in order to get those limited results, ultimately stretching the concept of recovery beyond the limits of reason or sound medicine in order to fake effectiveness.

Although the NIH study for Remdesivir failed to show a statistically significant reduction in deaths, NIH and the media have emphasized that there was a “trend” in a positive direction. That’s an unscientific pipedream. A “trend,” for example, is not a sufficient indicator of success for the FDA to approve a drug. If Fauci and his colleagues really thought the “trend” was going to be meaningful, they never would have prematurely ended the study before getting statistically significant evidence for this all-important failed result.

Finally, Remdesivir must be given intravenously over a ten-day period. This procedure itself has risks. It also limits its use to patients sick enough to be hospitalized. As a result, it cannot be used as hydroxychloroquine is used around the world, as a prophylaxis and as a treatment to be given at the earliest signs of the disease before any need for hospitalizaton.

Good News from a Corrupt VA Study

Meanwhile, the corrupt Veterans Administration study that claimed to show that hydroxychloroquine was useless and dangerous instead documented that it was saving lives. When we re-evaluated the study, publishing a report and a video, we found that the hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin combination was lifesaving.  The VA evaluated one group of patients who did so well that they did not require any specific medication or ventilation. They were the most well of the coronavirus patients with the very lowest death risk. The VA study then evaluated a group of the sickest patients, the ones most likely to die, who were given the more hazardous drug combination hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin.

How did the death rate of the sickest patients with combination drug treatment compare to the most well patients needing no drug treatment? There was no statistical difference in the death rates in the most well and the sickest groups. That is, the hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin combination was so astonishingly effective that it reduced the death among the sickest to the level of the most well patients. That’s a potential miracle drug!

A few days after we criticized the VA study, the Secretary of the VA made the TV rounds pointing out the inadequacy of the study, while praising the success of hydroxychloroquine in helping VA patients. He memorialized his opinions in a memo on April 29, 2020. 

Valid studies of this combination drug regimen, perhaps with the addition of zinc, are needed. In the meanwhile, when a study aimed at discrediting a drug unintentionally turns out to show that in a combination it reduces the mortality rate of the sickest patients to the level of the most well patients, we need to take the finding seriously.

Frontline Physicians Around the World Oppose Fauci’s Viewpoint

Meanwhile, hydroxychloroquine, sometimes in combination with zinc and/or azithromycin, was already being widely used to treat COVID-19 around the world and had numerous clinical testimonials and informal studies supporting it. We have made some of these available in our Coronavirus Resource Center on Tragically, and mainly due to Fauci, governors in states like New York and Michigan continued to illegally limit the availability of hydroxychloroquine to doctors.

May 7, 2020 survey of global physicians found that 55% were using hydroxychloroquine and 21% were using Remdesivir. The survey concluded, “Remdesivir and Hydroxychloroquine are perceived as almost equally safe and effective.” But as noted, hydroxychloroquine is safer, has enormously greater treatment experience behind it, and it is given orally for prophylaxis and early treatment, while Remdesivir is given intravenously to hospitalized patients.

Physicians around the world are resisting the growing political attacks on hydroxychloroquine. Unfortunately, we fear that fake promotionals from NIH and the FDA will make Remdesivir a financial bonanza for Gilead and those associated with the company. For decades, this is how drug profiteering has worked. Better, safer, and much less expensive generic drugs are pushed aside by a deluge of advertisements, press releases, and positive news coverage for newly approved drugs, which too often are more dangerous and less effective.

Fauci’s Corrupt Treatment Panel

How deeply in bed was Fauci with Gilead, the powerful, wealthy drug company that makes Remdesivir? Was Fauci bending over backward to favor Gilead?

Fauci’s institute has a panel for the purpose of developing treatment guidelines for the pandemic on an ongoing basis. It is called “NIH COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines.” Hundreds of drugs were coming up the pipeline seeking federal approval for treating the novel coronavirus. On a government treatment advisory panel, would you expect to find a dominant membership block that was financially indebted to one drug company with a single drug, while almost every other drug company and their drugs were left out?

Of the 50 members on Fauci’s committee to set treatment guidelines, only 11 had financial ties to drug companies. But nine of the eleven had financial ties to Gilead, Remdesivir’s manufacturer. The ties consisted of “Research Support,” “Consultant,” and “Advisory Board.” Put simply, from the beginning, Fauci was stacking his treatment guidelines committee with Gilead.

It is no surprise that the stacked panel, before any clinical trials, came out strongly in favor of the highly experimental Remdesivir and wholly against the commonly used hydroxychloroquine: “On the basis of preliminary clinical trial data, the Panel recommends the investigational antiviral agent Remdesivir for the treatment of COVID-19 in hospitalized patients with severe disease” and “The Panel does not recommend Remdesivir for the treatment of mild or moderate COVID-19 outside the setting of a clinical trial” (bold in original). Fauci’s outcome was predetermined or “fixed” from the start. This is not science and Fauci was acting like a promoter rather than a scientist.

What did Gilead get from Fauci? Everything. NIH organized and funded their trial, saving Gilead in the range of $100,000,000 dollars and, more importantly, years of time, while Fauci did his best to clean up any messy results. The Remdesivir clinical trial was “sponsored by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)” and was “the first clinical trial launched in the United States to evaluate an experimental treatment for COVID-19.” Gilead got what looked like a sure-thing bonanza from Fauci and Fauci is now desperately dancing around trying to keep it alive. His last-ditch magic trick was to pronounce the trial a success and then to cancel it before completion, so that the results could never be known.

Fauci was so comfortably intimate with Gilead that he dared to openly stack the treatment guidelines panel with people on the company’s payroll, while announcing the predetermined outcome in favor of Remdesivir and against hydroxychloroquine in these same treatment guidelines. If Fauci can be so shameless about such obviously corrupt behavior, how many even worse offenses would he be willing to perpetrate in secrecy?

Dr. Fauci is treated with inordinate respect by the media and politicians. When challenged on one occasion by Rand Paul, a senator who is a physician, Fauci replied smugly that he relied wholly on the scientific data. He spoke as if he—Dr. Anthony Fauci—were the sole paragon of objectivity and scientific acumen. This was an arrogant way to speak to a fellow physician and besides nothing could be further from the truth. Fauci’s handling of the NIH trials for Remdesivir, and his compulsive rejection of hydroxychloroquine, are more consistent with a master manipulator than an objective scientist. It no longer makes sense—and it is no longer safe—to listen to Fauci’s voice in the scientific and public discussion of the current coronavirus pandemic.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

What you need to know about these Experimental vaccines

The Torah Im Derech Eretz Society

A community of practitioners of Torah Im Derech Eretz

Monday, February 22, 2021

The state of Israel violates the Nuremberg Code

The COVID vaccine is experimental and basically untested. It uses components that have never been used in vaccines before.  Vaccines usually go through seven to eleven years of testing. This one received just a few months of minimal human testing and minimal animal testing. It is not a traditional vaccine that triggers immunity using deactivated viruses. Rather, it tries to trigger a reaction using synthetic messenger RNA that instructs the cells to make spike proteins that might trigger such a response. Yes, they are messing with your DNA. What is that? It is the genetic instruction for the development, functioning, growth and reproduction of all known organisms. This new mRNA technology has never been used on humans before. Attempts at corona vaccines over the decade have all failed and resulted in extensive animal deaths.

mRNA is very unstable once in the cell, so to preserve it manufacturers are using a chemical called PEG which has a history of causing anaphylactic reactions. It has never been used in a vaccine before. Manufacturers are claiming that the mRNA doesn’t get into the cell nucleus where the chromosomes are. However, they are not testing to see whether that’s actually true. It’s all theoretical. If it goes into the chromosomes it will permanently alter your cells. Moreover, the nanoparticles used to wrap the mRNA can bypass the blood brain barrier and alter brain function.  

The state of Israel secured enough doses to vaccinate the entire country in exchange for agreeing to pass the medical records of the entire country back to the vaccine makers who did not adequately test their vaccines. Netanyahu admitted to this when he said, “From the beginning of the Corona I have been in personal contact with the vaccine companies. I told the CEO of Pfizer that I am ready for a contract of millions of vaccines and you will get the data so you can know what your level of success is.”

In other words, Israel is conducting a medical experiment on the entire population and is pressuring people in Israel to take the vaccine, even preventing many from earning a living unless they take it. This is a violation of the Nuremberg Code, which is a set of research ethics principles for human experimentation created as a result of the Nuremberg trials at the end of the Second World War. 

Point 1 of the code says, “The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.” Point 5 says, “No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.” The state of Israel, the self-proclaimed “Jewish state” is violating principles that were established in response to the Holocaust. 

The state of Israel also agreed to hold harmless the vaccine makers for any injury. They have enjoyed this exemption in the USA since 1986. So the vaccine makers know they cannot be sued for injuring or killing people. Would you buy any complicated product where the manufacturer is exempt from liability? Concern of financial responsibility for liability is the main factor that keeps many corporations in line. If the product is safe, why would such an exemption be necessary? 

Point 6 of the code says, “The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.” In Israel, the average age of death from COVID is 80. The average life expectancy in Israel is 83.5. The government reports 5,400 COVID deaths out of a population of 9 million people. Meanwhile, 8,000 people die every year from diseases caused by cigarette smoking, 800 from second hand smoke. Yet, the government does not go to any noticeable lengths to stop smoking. 

In the USA, the Center for Disease Control reported that only 6% of the deaths listed as COVID deaths were COVID only. 94% were people who had other serious medical conditions and may not have been infected with COVID at all. They died with COVID and not from it. They were still labeled as being COVID deaths because they were given a PCR test which tests only for exposure not infection. Moreover, many were tested at a magnification cycle rate that makes results unreliable. Reporting in Israel works along similar lines to those in the USA. Proper investigation needs to determine what percentage of the 5,400 are really COVID deaths.

Death for younger people is rare. From day one of this crisis through February 2021, roughly a year, 134 people under the age of 50 have died from or with corona virus. 104 of those were between 30 and 49. 30 were under 30. The median age in Israel is 29.7. That means more than half the population is under 30, That’s 30 deaths out of 4.5 million people, which is half the population. The government seeks to vaccinate the entire country, even people in age groups that have seen a tiny amount of deaths, statistically zero. This is a violation of point 6 of the Nuremberg Code. Any benefit does not justify the risk to the majority of the population. Moreover, we don’t even know if there will be any benefit as the vaccine makers have said the vaccines only reduce symptoms. They do not eliminate the virus.

It is extraordinary that the State of Israel, whose leaders often depict it as the answer to the Holocaust is violating the international agreements made in response to Nazi atrocities. They attempt to justify everything by generating fear. Yet, the data shows the fear to be unreasonable. Unfortunately, Israeli leaders have a long history of using fear to control the population. It has always been their favorite tool. 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Letter to our Attorney General

I am writing to ask how I may go about having certain irresponsible people charged with terrorism.

What in fact is seasonal flu is and has been all along is wrongfully being called a pandemic. The late Kary Mullis, who developed the PCR test was most emphatic about not using this test as a diagnostic tool, as this test gives up to 97% false positives: (1)

This means the numbers being shown daily are up to 97% false! That said, using those bogus numbers to ‘predict’ where the next ‘spread’ will be using completely unscientific ‘modeling’ * is meant to scare people into submission and civil obedience, and to try to justify lockdowns. This link takes you to the site wherein ‘Scores of Physicians Want Americans to Know the Truth about Coronavirus: Continued Lockdown Dangerous, Even Deadly’: (2)

Many provinces in Canada, many states in the U.S. and many countries throughout the world are under this dangerous and completely illegal, unscientific, and unwarranted lockdown. That is, of course, unless they happen to be a large, corporately owned and run business such as Walmart and Costco. How is it possible to not be in any danger in these stores, but all restaurants, gyms, small businesses are considered toxic environments? And if it’s so unsafe for the average citizen to leave home, how is it safe for our politicians to travel and visit family, friends and businesses? (3)

As for masks, again, SCIENCE shows these do very little to stop the spread of what we are being led to believe is neigh on to a death sentence. In actuality, masks make many especially children sick. (4)

As to the so-called ‘science’ being used to determine these Draconian measures, consisting of lockdowns, social distancing and masking almost everyone meant to halt the spread of what is no more than yearly flu? This site tells of how this all began using a 14 year old’s science project: (5)

Those who suffer during flu season are the elderly and/or those with underlying conditions. More children die from seasonal flu than have from Covid. When Toronto’s Hospital for Sick Children said that masks are unnecessary and dangerous for children, they were forced to reverse themselves. Doctors are being pressured to declare Covid as the cause of thousands of deaths which were actually the result of many other causes. This includes people being denied, as per the College of Doctors and Physicians, life-saving surgeries, cancer diagnoses and subsequent  treatments. Some are even being so terrified by these sham numbers that when someone suspects they do have the virus, they are too frightened of catching the dreaded ‘plague’ to go to hospital at all or after it is too late. Speaking of plague, as people are so scared to come to hospital, many parents are not vaccinating their children. Most diseases such as Polio have been almost completely eradicated, but how long until these diseases return, especially as, due to lockdown, we are not sending supplies of food and medicine to 3rd world countries? And why have we not been advised of any measures to stave off the flu, or, if one does get the flu, such as taking Vitamins C & D, which will help mitigate the severity therein? Also important is the fact that, as those who actually have this seasonal flu and do seek medical attention are refused treatment. Many have also died who would not have but for refusal of too many frightened doctors to treat using drugs such as Hydroxychloroquine? (6) It is also important to know the truth about survival if one does contract this virus, as per the CDC: 

0-19: 99.997%      20-49: 99.98%     50-69: 99.5%     70+: 94.6%.

I also do not understand why healthy people are being queuing up to get tested, and if they miraculously get a negative result, they are then frightened into isolating. This is because they are being told they ‘could’ be asymptomatic and a threat to others. Here is a site which shows the results of a study of 10,000, 000 people to find if there is any evidence therein: (7)

There is so much irrefutable evidence that our Human Rights and Freedoms are being taken away. We are not in the midst of a pandemic but rather seasonal flu which doesn’t seem to exist anymore. Also, that masks and lockdowns do far more harm than the little they help. And as far more people are dying not from Covid but rather the measures being taken to try to eliminate it, I am begging you to let Ontario reopen, to have our lives back, to have fun, go to concerts, theatres, gyms, restaurants, meet with friends for coffee, to let children play, learn in normal surrounds of schools, to not believe that despite not being ill, they are still infectious. Everything which has been done and is still being done has been the exact opposite of what should have been done, what has been done in all years past. Even during the 1918 plague, only the sick were quarantined. Before there is one more bankruptcy, suicide, overdose, domestic abuse or closure of another small business, please stop this illegal, irresponsible and most devastating lockdown, forcible mask wearing, and the daily posting of erroneous ‘case’ numbers meant to scare everyone into submission and obedience.

All news seems to be concerned with of late are vaccines; which companies shall be used first, which members of society should receive the vaccine first, will those who refuse be isolated, denied access to particular areas of society, unable perhaps to travel, go to movies, given medical treatment for other ills? I read that in Germany and Israel, (ironic or what?) they are speaking of interment camps for those who refuse any of these untested, unnecessary, unproved with respect to efficacy, gene-altering vaccines. Also being considered is giving cards to those who do get vaccinated, thus those who do not… (I do see a black market arising.)

So why isn’t mainstream media speaking out about these Draconian measures which are taking away people’s rights and freedoms on an unprecedented scale? This has been what appears to be a worldwide Scare-demic in order to vaccinate the masses, making Big Pharma ever wealthier, as well as enforcing laws meant to control societies using fake science to justify lockdowns, masking, social distancing and vaccinations. What I do not understand is why, of all newspapers, yours, the only one brave enough to uncover the wrongdoings of then President Nixon, yours is not telling the truth about this entire scam. I thought if any newspaper would, it would be The Washington Post…and yet?

I am attaching 25 consequences resulting from actions taken to ‘control the spread’ of Covid while ensuring the spread of fear, lies and control. Just this morning I watched a short video put out by Dr. Scott Jensen, who told of a patient with an enormous mass, which he fears is cancer. This patient, however, has not left her house in over three months, and will only agree to come to his office, not to the hospital, the only place where he can do a proper diagnosis using an MRI. Ultimately, unless he can convince her that the only thing she should be afraid of is not getting the testing and if it is cancer, treatment. Instead, she will more than likely die alone, in her home, as she’s much more afraid of the possibility of catching Covid than she is of having and not treating cancer. This is only one of hundreds of instances whereby the politicians have insisted that mainstream media post outrageous numbers of ‘cases’ in order to terrorize people into staying home. And as if that isn’t bad enough, our tax dollars are now being used to promote this propaganda, wherein a few young friends are having dinner together, and then we see people on respirators and meant to show they are dying because of these selfish people having a small dinner gathering. This lie harkens back to the study mentioned above about the factious fear of asymptomatic spread. 

For the above reasons, as well as the attached list of some 25 consequences which are direct results of the over-reaction to Covid that I wish to have charged, the following people for terrorism, as that is exactly what they are guilty of:

As for those responsible, it is my hope that those responsible for the bankrupting of societies worldwide are sent to jail where they belong. Our tax dollars are now being used on advertising which shows healthy people having dinner, which in turn causes others to end up in hospital via asymptomatic spread. Then they display the message “save lives, stay home.’ This is despicable and only serves to make people feel guilty about living their lives, going to homes of friends and/or family.  

Premiere Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, Premiere Doug Ford, Theresa Tam, (who is not only working for Canada, but also The W.H.O. thus creating a major conflict of interest, Dr. Eileen de Villa, Minister of Health, Patty Hajdu, Chief Medical Officer Dr. David Williams, (none of these doctors are virologists,) Mayor John Tory, PostMedia Network which owns The Toronto Sun among other newspapers, The Toronto Star, The Globe and Mail, CP24 which has, for months been posting these seditious and erroneous numbers of ‘cases’ daily in order to continually terrorize people, The CBC, CTV and Global news. I can personally attest to having sent all of these people scientific data which specifically states this was never a pandemic, lockdowns and masks cause much more harm than any (perceived) good they may do. I know from seeing interviews with accredited doctors, scientists and virologists that they too have been writing to these people for months to see that they are correctly informed, to no avail.

Many, many scientists, doctors, virologists and scientists have tried to show the actual science to those above, but have been ignored, rebuked, made to look like conspiracy theorists, laughed at, and ostracized. Also guilty of terrorism is the Ministry of Education, for making children feel responsible for the spread of this virus by not social distancing, not staying home enough, and for making children wear masks all day in class and outside on the playground: Lieutenant Governor, Hon. Elizabeth DowdeswellOntario’s Education Minister, Hon. Todd Smith, Policy Advisor 
Jordan Adair. These scare tactics have resulted also in many being convinced they ‘need’ one of these experimental, untested, unnecessary and potentially unsafe vaccines. These people are also trying to come up with ways to circumvent the Nuremberg Code, as outlined in the following: (8)  One of the ways discussed is to give bracelets to those who get vaccinated, or worse:

TORONTO — Ontarians who refuse to get the COVID-19 vaccine when it’s available could face restrictions, the province’s health minister says. While Christine Elliott said the vaccine will not be mandatory in Ontario, things like travel and access to communal spaces like movie theatres could be restricted as measures being proposed. Just as masks and distancing have divided those who know the truth and those who have been sufficiently terrorized, this is a way of forcing people to get one of these experimental vaccines. I deem that these tactics are highly illegal, not to mention immoral. (9)  This too is terrorism. One other terrorist organization is the College of Doctors and Physicians, as they are threatening doctors who speak out against not only these lies, but about having to refuse to treat patients in dire need of things such as cancer screening and treatment. (10) I am also giving a link to an interview with 3 prominent doctors, two of whom work in Toronto. They tell of how many new parents are so terrified they are not bringing their babies to be vaccinated against diseases which, until recently, had been all but eradicated around the world. Our actions, or rather inactions are seeing the return of such horrific diseases as Polio and Measles. The spread of these diseases are much more concerning than the spread of seasonal flu could ever be. As these doctors state in this interview session, what ever happened to discussions amongst doctors with respect to treating patients? These three brave doctors are being vilified rather than lauded, by the very body which is meant to ensure doctors, as per their sworn oath, do no harm, and put the health of their patients ahead of all else, especially political agendas (11.)

 I would appreciate if you could let me know what I can do to see that these people face charges of terrorism, and how we may reopen our province and prevent any more of the ongoing consequences as per my attachment. 

Dee C. Burns


Below are the links as numbered in this letter:

( 1)

( 2)  Modeling Is Not Science: Another Demonstration | Politics and Prosperity

( 3)  Lockdowns Do Not Control the Coronavirus: The Evidence – AIER

( 4)

( 5)  Misguided Shutdown Policy Began as High School Science Project (

 ( 6) Treatments for COVID-19 – Harvard Health

( 7)  Study of 10 million Chinese shows asymptomatic spread of covid never existed – World Tribune: News, World News, Geopolitical intelligence, China, North Korea, Geostrategy, Military, National security, East Asia Intelligence, Politics and Culture, Life, Columnists: Jeffrey Kuhner, Donald Kirk, Willy Lam, Grace Vuoto, John Metzler, Sol Sanders, Norman Bailey, Jong-Heon Lee.

( 8)  The Nuremberg Code (

( 9)  Ontarians could face restrictions if they refuse to get COVID-19 vaccine, health minister says | CTV News

(10) Ontario College of Physicians and Surgeons cautions doctor after complaints about COVID-19 tweets (


Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Chinese Virus (CCP) Contradictions

Why are people convinced, despite numerous studies proving the opposite, that masks and distancing stave off the spread, why is there any need to limit how many customers may shop simultaneously? As the weather here in Canada is quite bone-chilling, isn’t insisting people (especially during the hour specifically allocated to those over 60 and those with underlying conditions) line up for periods of time, outside in the frigid cold counter intuitive?

  • Studies done over many years have proven masks do not stop the spread of viruses. Surgeons and nurses who perform clean surgery wear disposable protective masks. The purpose of the mask is not only to prevent germs from entering the patient’s wound from the surgeon’s nose and mouth, but also to protect the surgeon’s face from spray and spatter. Healthy people do not need and should not be forced to don masks.
  • As children are least likely to get this Chinese virus and if they do have a recovery rate of 99%, why are they forced to don masks, ‘social distance’ and our ignorant government about to force students to be tested using this corrupt testing, for Covid? This is so wrong and so invasive; I can only hope parents and teachers alike make enough of a stink that our moronic Premiere will be made to reverse this despicable decision. Also, closing schools, cancelling all activities and not even allowing children to play with friends or do anything outdoors is not only unnecessary, but is having negative effects which will impact their lives for years to come.
  • As a study of 10,000,000 (yes, that is 10 MILLION) people who were deemed asymptomatic proved the likelihood of them spreading the Chinese virus about 1 in 10,000,000, thus completely negligible.

     As the Chinese virus has a survival rates are as follows: 0-19:     99.997% 20-49: 99.98% 50-69: 99.5% 70+: 94.6%, I am curious as to why this new vaccine is being so hastily rushed to market, especially when I’ve read we still should wear masks, may need up to 7 injections and may still get the virus. This is unnecessary, untested and most of all, totally unwarranted. Here are some timelines of vaccines which were meticulously researched and tested; Typhoid, 13 years, Yellow fever, 19 years, and Polio, 21 years. Corona vaccine: under a year, and the Phase 3 (animal) testing is being done on we humans. There has obviously not been any long-term testing for efficacy or side-effects.

  • The late Kary Mullis, developer of the PCR test said emphatically this was not a diagnostic tool, as it gives up to 97% false positives. Why, then is this test being touted as the Gold Standard for testing? Not only that, but it is also being used in such a way as to guarantee the most positive outcomes when used on healthy people. A PCR test is amplifying samples through repetitive cycles. The lower the virus concentration in the sample, the more cycles are needed to achieve a positive result. Many US labs work with 35 to 45 cycles, while many European labs work with 30 to 40 cycles.

The research group of French professor Didier Raoult has recently shown that at a cycle threshold (ct) of 25, about 70% of samples remained positive in cell culture (i.e. were infectious); at a ct of 30, 20% of samples remained positive; at a ct of 35, 3% of samples remained positive; and at a ct above 35, no sample remained positive (infectious) in cell. In Canada, most labs set the limit of cycles to detect the virus’ genetic material, or RNA, to between 35 and 40 cycles, though some Ontario labs have “positivity” cut-offs as high as 45 cycles, according to a study first flagged by Westphalian Times. Mina, a physician, and epidemiologist, thinks the cut-off should be closer to 30. (The number of cycles to detect RNA is known as the cycle threshold, or CT value.)

This means that if a person gets a “positive” PCR test result at a cycle threshold of 35 or higher (as applied in most US labs and many European labs), the chance that the person is infectious is less than 3%. The chance that the person received a “false positive” result is 97% or higher.

  •  It has been proven that lockdowns cause more harm than good and there are far more people dying as a result of suicides, domestic violence, drug overdoses, loneliness, lack of treatment by doctors capitulating to politicians’ demands they only treat those with symptoms of having the Chinese virus. Doctors swore the Hippocratic oath which states first, Do No Harm! Why are doctors allowing themselves to renege on that oath, as they are doing massive harm when not treating people, and now they are expected to give unproven, experimental vaccines to everyone, consequences be damned.
  • Why, when modeling is not science but more like buying futures in the stock market, using outrageously inflated numbers of so-called cases to predict where there will be outbreaks next? This unscientific guessing game is the only thing being used by politicians, even in areas where no-one has been reported to be sick. And when putting in these wildly exaggerated and most erroneous numbers into their Magic 8-Ball, of course politicians are using this to justify lockdowns, masks, and untested, unnecessary, and unwarranted vaccines.
  • Why is it that we healthy citizens are being forced to isolate, not allowed to work, run their business or travel? Why aren’t politicians made to adhere to the very edicts they put into place to ‘stop the spread’ of what we know is seasonal flu? Was this a true pandemic, wouldn’t they be risking not only their own health but the health of others when travelling and attending/holding gatherings of much more than 5 people? Why, when they have been sussed upon returning from vacations, aren’t they given fines for thousands of dollars as are those who go to empty schoolyards to play basketball with no-one else around? Why indeed!
  • Why aren’t social media platforms investigating the truth behind this Scare-demic? Why are they complicate in spreading dubious material and presenting them as truths?  Why are they removing the facts about this virus as told by accredited scientists, virologists and doctors with years of scientific studies?   Platforms such as FaceBook and Twitter are denying factual, substantiated evidence by calling it misinformation, removing the posts and banning those who post the results of corroborated, peer-reviewed long-time studies which go against the lies being perpetrated by mainstream media at the behest of politicians and drug companies. FB, Twitter and others; DO YOUR DAMN HOMEWORK AND STOP BEING POLITICAL PAWNS!
  •  Why are these falsified numbers of so-called cases (I say so-called as a case is not someone who has been tested and get false positives. Cases refer to people who are actually ill and receiving treatment in or out of hospitals) being plastered all over the news both day and night if not to scare people into submission?

Also please remember we have the right to opt out of these experimental, untested, unnecessary and unwarranted vaccines. They have not been tested properly, as they have not had independent animal trials, were ready in under a year, and are labelled EXPERIMENTAL!!!! Refer to the Nuremberg Code; here are the first lines which outline this code, followed by the link to the entire code:

The ‘Doctors Trial’ (USA vs Karl Brandt) during the Nuremberg Trials following WW2, which established the Nuremberg Code regulating the ethics of medical intervention.

Some people might not be familiar with the verb “to dissemble”, but we all need to become familiar with it, because there is a lot of dissembling going on.

It basically means to deliberately conceal something or obfuscate it, so that one’s attention is misdirected or deflected from whatever the Dissembler wishes to obscure. Like the truth. And in this case, the truth about the Nuremberg Code and the protection it provides us from accepting any forced medical procedure or therapy at all. 

Nuremberg code will prevent you from having to accept the COVID-19 vaccine. |

For those who feel I’m being racist by calling this the Chinese Virus, here are 17 other diseases named after populations or places:

  • West Nile Virus

Named after the West Nile District of Uganda discovered in 1937.

  • Guinea Worm

Named by European explorers for the Guinea coast of West Africa in the 1600s.

  • Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever

Named after the mountain range spreading across western North America first recognized first in 1896 in Idaho.

  • Lyme Disease

Named after a large outbreak of the disease occurred in Lyme and Old Lyme, Connecticut in the 1970s.

  • Ross River Fever

Named after a mosquito found to cause the disease in the Ross River of Queensland, Australia by the 1960s. The first major outbreak occurred in1928.

  • Omsk Hemorrhagic Fever

Named after its 1940s discovery in Omsk, Russia.

  • Ebola Hemorrhagic Fever

Named in 1976 for the Ebola River in Zaire located in central Africa.

  • Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS)

Also known as “camel flu,” MERS was first reported in Saudi Arabia in 2012 and all cases are linked to those who traveled to the Middle Eastern peninsula.

  • Valley Fever

Valley Fever earned its nickname from a 1930s outbreak San Joaquin Valley of California, though its first case came from Argentina.

  • Marburg Virus Disease

Named after Marburg, Germany in 1967.

  • Norovirus

Named after Norwalk, Ohio after an outbreak in 1968.

  • Zika Fever

First discovered in 1947 and named after the Zika Forest in Uganda.

  • Japanese Encephalitis

Named after its first case in Japan in 1871.

  • German Measles

Named after the German doctors who first described it in the 18th century. The disease is also sometimes referred to as “Rubella.”

  • Spanish Flu

While the true origins of the Spanish Flu remain unknown, the disease earned its name after Spain began to report deaths from the flu in its newspapers.

  • Lassa Fever

Named after the being found in Lassa, Nigeria in 1969.

  • Legionnaire’s Disease

Named in 1976 following an outbreak of people contracting the lung infection after attending an American Legion convention in Philadelphia.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Sent to small businesses in Ontario

I am writing to ask, as this edict is unlawful and has no basis for enacting it, is it unreasonable to disobey it? I am wondering why there is only one Civil Rights lawyer in all of Ontario who has put together a class action suit regarding illegal lockdowns, masks, distancing, shutting down small businesses while allowing corporately owned businesses to open, many of which are depriving people exempt from masks their (our) human right to breath, police not upholding the law by defending people’s rights according to the Charter of Rights.

In order to declare an emergency, should not the government be required to prove the existence of said crisis? Year over year mortality shows 2020 was about the same as previous years.


Description automatically generated

Furthermore, violations of the Charter of Rights & Freedoms utilizing the Notwithstanding Clause, must be demonstrably justified. The Supreme Court of Canada has created what is now called the Oakes test to ascertain the validity of violations; that the benefits outweigh the negative impacts.


  1. the government must establish that the law under review has a goal that is both “pressing and substantial.” The law must be both important and necessary. (The government has not adequately established the necessity of enacting emergency measures)
  2. The court then conducts a proportionality analysis using three sub-tests.
    1. The government must first establish that the provision of the law which limits a Charter right is rationally connected to the law’s purpose. If it is arbitrary or serves no logical purpose, it must be struck down. (Such as requiring healthy people to wear a mask.)
    1. Secondly, a provision must minimally impair the violated Charter right. A provision that limits a Charter right will be constitutional only if it impairs the Charter right as little as possible or is “within a range of reasonably supportable alternatives” (Lockdowns have an enormous impact on all aspects of life, which are not reasonably justified given what we know about the mortality rate.)
    1. Finally the court examines the law’s proportionate effects. Even if the government can satisfy the aforementioned criteria, the effect of the provision on the Charter rights may be too high a price to pay for the advantage the provision would provide in advancing the law’s purpose. (Lockdowns have resulted in higher rates of suicide, drug overdoses, alcoholism,  domestic and child abuse)

 Outside the constitutionality of enacting emergency measures. The next issue to examine is the PCR test. It is not a diagnostic tool. The inventor of the PCR test, Kary Mullis was most emphatic about not using it for viral infection diagnoses. In fact, he stated that if you increase the cycle threshold high enough, you could find one of every molecule in the universe in a human sample. The following article explains the PCR test and why it should not be used:

Over a cycle count of 35 (Ontario is using 40), the PCR test is estimated to give up to 97% false readings, which means the numbers being shown daily are highly inaccurate. That said, using those numbers to ‘predict’ where the next ‘spread’ will be is meant to make people believe the spread can be controlled, and attempt to justify lockdowns. Lockdowns Do Not Control the Coronavirus: The Evidence – AIER

And yet, all of Ontario is under this dangerous and completely unwarranted lockdown, unless of course, you happen to be a large, corporately owned and run business such as Walmart, Costco, Lowes and several others. How is it possible to not be in any danger in these stores, but all restaurants, gyms, small businesses are considered toxic environments? The answer is, Study of 10 million Chinese shows asymptomatic spread of CoVID-19 never existed: Post-lockdown SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid screening in nearly ten million residents of Wuhan, China – PubMed (

Decades of the highest quality studies show masks do nothing to stop the spread of upper respiratory viruses. They give people a false sense of security and can be dangerous if proper precautions are not followed. And it is highly unlikely people are following the advice regarding the risks, so the bottom line is masks are likely harming the health of people rather than keeping them safe. Here is a link to an excellent article that presents both sides of the argument.

Are you wondering what science is being used to determine these measures consisting of lockdowns, social distancing and masking? This came from a high school student in the form a science project which was promoted by her computer modeler father and adopted as policy by the Bush administration, however it did not advocate lockdowns. It is not science, it is a model: Misguided Shutdown Policy Began as High School Science Project (

Those who suffer most during flu season are the elderly and people with underlying conditions. More children die from seasonal flu than have from CoVID-19. Also, when Hospital for Sick Children, in a press release, stated masks are unnecessary and dangerous for children, they were forced to reverse themselves; just as doctors are being pressured to declare CoVID-19 as the cause of thousands of deaths which were the result of other causes. This includes people being denied life-saving surgeries, cancer treatments and people, out of fear, delaying medical intervention until it is too late. Public Health authorities have neglected to advocate any prevention (prophylactic) or treatment measures, yet it is documented that Vitamin D can mitigate and perhaps prevent CoVID-19.

CoVID-19 has been shown to be treatable with readily available drugs and supplements: Treatments for COVID-19 – Harvard Health.

You may be asking the reasons behind falsifying data, demanding people wear masks (including employees forced to wear masks for hours while working,) social distancing and lockdowns. I have never been a conspiracy believer, but there are times when there is a conspiracy if only by complicit actions, and this is one of those times: Globalists Openly Admitting To Population Control Agenda: Globalists Openly Admitting To Population Control Agenda (

Belarusian President Claims IMF & World Bank Offered him a Bribe to Impose COVID Restrictions –

Belarusian President Aleksandr Lukashenko said last month via Belarusian Telegraph Agency, BelTA., that World Bank and IMF offered him a bribe of $940 million USD in the form of “Covid Relief Aid.” In exchange for $940 million USD, the World Bank and IMF demanded that the President of Belarus:

• imposed “extreme lockdown on his people”
• force them to wear face masks
• impose very strict curfews
• impose a police state
• crash the economy

Belarus President Aleksandr Lukashenko REFUSED the offer and stated that he could not accept such an offer and would put his people above the needs of the IMF and World Bank. This is NOT a conspiracy. You may research this yourself. He actually said this!

Now IMF and World Bank are bailing out failing airlines with billions of dollars, and in exchange, they are FORCING airline CEOs to implement VERY STRICT POLICIES such as FORCED face masks covers on EVERYONE, including SMALL CHILDREN, whose health will suffer as a result of these policies.

And if it is true for Belarus, then it is true for the rest of the world! The IMF and World Bank want to crash every major economy with the intent of buying over every nation’s infrastructure at cents on the dollar!

If you want to save your business(es) from bankruptcy, I implore you to not wait for this fraud to come before the courts, but to open your business immediately. Once it has been determined in court that lockdowns are illegal, any fines incurred are like fruit from the poisonous tree and will be dismissed. Many are crowdfunding so they can afford a lawyer to fight these erroneous fines. Details emerge of lawsuit over government’s coronavirus response (

Which is worse; getting a fine you almost assuredly will not have to pay, or losing your business forever?

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Dr. Roger Hodkinson, MA, MB, FRCPC, FCAP, CEO and medical director of Western Medical Assessments re: Scare-demic

Dr. Roger Hodkinson, MA, MB, FRCPC, FCAP, CEO and medical director of Western Medical Assessments, spoke at the Edmonton City Council Community and Public Services Committee meeting on Nov. 13 about the city’s move to extend its face-covering bylaw. He was listed as speaker number 95 on the meeting agenda.

Hodkinson was trained at Cambridge University in the UK. He is ex-president of the pathology section of the Medical Association. He was the chairman of the Royal College of Physicians of Canada Examination Committee and Pathology in Ottawa, Canada.

OK, well we would love to hear from you, the floor is yours.

Thank you very much. I do appreciate the opportunity to address you on this very important matter. What I’m going to say is lay language, and blunt. It is counter-narrative, and so you don’t immediately think I’m a quack, I’m going to briefly outline my credentials so that you can understand where I’m coming from in terms of knowledge base in all of this.

I’m a medical specialist in pathology which includes virology. I trained at Cambridge University in the UK. I’m the ex-president of the pathology section of the Medical Association. I was previously an assistant professor in the Faculty of Medicine doing a lot of teaching. I was the chairman of the Royal College of Physicians of Canada Examination Committee and Pathology in Ottawa, but more to the point I’m currently the chairman of a biotechnology company in North Carolina selling the COVID-19 test.

And [inaudible] you might say I know a little bit about all of this. The bottom line is simply this: There is utterly unfounded public hysteria driven by the media and politicians. It’s outrageous. This is the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on an unsuspecting public. There is absolutely nothing that can be done to contain this virus. Other than protecting older, more vulnerable people. It should be thought of as nothing more than a bad flu season. This is not Ebola. It’s not SARS. It’s politics playing medicine and that’s a very dangerous game.

There is no action of any kind needed other than what happened last year when we felt unwell. We stayed home, we took chicken noodle soup, we didn’t visit granny and we decided when we would return to work. We didn’t need anyone to tell us.

Masks are utterly useless. There is no evidence base for their effectiveness whatsoever. Paper masks and fabric masks are simply virtue-signaling. They’re not even worn effectively most of the time. It’s utterly ridiculous. Seeing these unfortunate, uneducated people — I’m not saying that in a pejorative sense — seeing these people walking around like lemmings, obeying without any knowledge base, to put the mask on their face.

Social distancing is also useless because COVID is spread by aerosols which travel 30 meters or so before landing. Enclosures have had such terrible unintended consequences. Everywhere should be opened tomorrow as well as was stated in the Great Barrington Declaration that I circulated prior to this meeting.

And a word on testing: I do want to emphasize that I’m in the business of testing for COVID. I do want to emphasize that positive test results do not, underlined in neon, mean a clinical infection. It’s simply driving public hysteria and all testing should stop. Unless you’re presenting to the hospital with some respiratory problem.

All that should be done is to protect the vulnerable and to give them all in the nursing homes that are under your control, give them all 3,000 to 5,000 international units of vitamin D every day which has been shown to radically reduce the likelihood of Infection.

And I would remind you all that using the province’s own statistics, the risk of death under 65 in this province is one in 300,000. One in 300,000. You’ve got to get a grip on this.

The scale of the response that you are undertaking with no evidence for it is utterly ridiculous given the consequences of acting in a way that you’re proposing. All kinds of suicides, business closures, funerals, weddings etc. It’s simply outrageous! It’s just another bad flu and you’ve got to get your minds around that.

Let people make their own decisions. You should be totally out of the business of medicine. You’re being led down the garden path by the chief medical officer of health for this province. I am absolutely outraged that this has reached this level. It should all stop tomorrow.

Thank you very much.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Time to take back our lives, our freedoms and our future, (oh, my!)

Why are people still calling it a ‘pandemic?’ It is a Scare-demic! COVID-19 is not a pandemic. It is a syndemic. The syndemic nature of the threat we face means that a more nuanced approach is needed if we are to protect the health of our communities. The notion of a syndemic was first conceived by Merrill Singer, an American medical anthropologist, in the 1990s.

To continue to call it a pandemic lends credence to those taking away our rights and freedoms. By calling it that, and saying we have the right to choose is contradictory, and makes it like we should do what they say, but only if we want to.

People need to address the facts; first, as I’ve written, it’s not a pandemic, and is little more than a cold or mild flu. Yes, for those who are at risk, such as the elderly and those with underlying conditions, it is more severe and can and has been deadly. BUT for 95% of the population, it is not life-threatening, and those who get it will get over it just like any other cold or flu.

Second, isolation is not working; why? Because the ill effects are much worse than the POSSIBILITY of catching the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) flu. Many have been denied much needed medical attention and as a result have died. Others cannot tolerate the loneliness and have died. Here is a link telling of how dangerous isolation is to humans:

Next, the truth about masks and how, like isolation, it is more damaging than it is helpful:

Then there is the destruction that shutting down the economy causes, to people’s mental health and to their lives: this is a link to many studies of the cost, and not just in dollars, of shutting down the economy:

And lastly, how this is all a Communist conspiracy to spread Communism around the world, using scare tactics to enslave the populous. This article by Leslyn Lewis tells how we are playing right into the hands of the CCP:

I would appreciate if everyone would go to these links and understand why we must fight these draconian measures which are the opposite of everything our governments are doing, supposedly in the best interest of Canadians. Also, they have never spoken of how to stay safe and fight off infections, like taking vitamins D & C. They tell people to stay inside, but in fact, sunlight is one of the best ways to staying healthy. Recently Spain told that 80% of their CCP virus patients were Vitamin D deficient. Also, when people become doctors, they take the Hippocratic oath to first and foremost, do no harm. By not allowing people to get the medical help and/or surgical attention they need, they are doing harm, and are allowing government to dictate their actions (or in too many cases, inactions.)

We must make people realize the lies are what the government is telling us, that ‘modeling’ is not science, that all that governments have done and are continuing to do is the opposite of science, and ask why they suddenly believe governments are doing what is in our best interest when in fact they are doing what is in their own and the CCP’s interests, full stop!

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Our Teflon Crime Minister gets away with

I used to believe Canada was at least a quasi-democracy, that there was such a thing as opposition parties and accountability when even the highest-ranking politician broke the law.

Instead, he who is supposed to be our leader, supposed to actually care for his citizens instead CAUSED the mess in which we are presently in the midst, with no end in sight. The P.M. knew in December about the virus, was warned to close the border at least to China from whence the virus stemmed, but only now does he want to focus on the virus. Why? To once again get out being accountable for yet another crime, that of his knowingly putting his family on the more-than-generous payroll of WE. He already got away with putting the kybosh on the investigation into the SNC Lavalin scandal, his having groped a woman who of course, saw his abuse differently than did he, his thrice being photographed in blackface, and let’s not forget that upon assuming his new position as leader of Canada, he went on vacation on the private island of the Aga Khan. And while the records are sealed (can you say Payoff?) we know he was fired from the only job he ever had before this one, because of having (oh, excuse me, allegedly) having inappropriate relations with one of his 14 years young students.

And now, the brat wanted to insure he got away with yet another ethics violation by threatening to call an election in the middle of what scare mongers like to call a pandemic. Of course, all who capitulated did so as they truly care about we Canadians. Yeah, and I have got some swamp land in Florida for all those who still believe there are any opposition parties. In Trudeau’s case, it is all for one and one for, well, himself and whatever he has promised to those who refused to take him down.

There is nary a politician in power that can even define the words opposition or ethics, much less abide by their roles as such. Canadians deserve a helluva lot better, but sadly, that is NEVER going to happen; and that just stinks!

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

It’s time to take back our freedom!!!

Well, here we are in month six of what is now referred to as a Scare-demic. When the Chief Medical Officer is insisting doctors go against the Hippocratic oath they swore to uphold when becoming a doctor, that which states they do no harm, there is more than a little problem.

Doctors, at whose behest we cannot be certain, sent sick and contagious patients from regular hospitals to long-term care facilities, which ultimately resulted in many unnecessary deaths, there is a huge problem. Shouldn’t the politicians being taking their cues from the Chief Medical Officer, who should be using science-based evidence to direct the courses of action, rather than vice-versa?

The truth, though too many are much too scared to believe truth over lies meant to elongate the duration of what is just merely another form of the flu. There is scientific proof from years of studies which prove a) lockdowns do not work, and b) only those who cannot stay home when sick need to wear a mask. In fact, they both have the opposite effect, as lockdowns keep people isolated, causing them to become depressed, sometimes violent, suicidal, and feeling hopeless, while depriving people of fresh air and human contact. And not once has our C.M.O. told that taking Vitamins C and D help fight off Covid and lessen the effects for those who have it. Instead, we are subjected to daily ‘updates’ using faulty data, which result from faulty tests. We are given numbers of cases, again, based on faulty data, something we never experienced during any other Flu season, not even during SARS, which at that time was as unknown as today’s Covid.

I have forwarded, as per his asking that we ‘show him the science’ our Premier many studies proving what has been and is still being done is against everything we have done in the past. He has instead, turned ours into a Fascist society, using threats of enormous fines to force stores and restaurants which he is deems suitable to operate, turning shopkeepers into Gestapo police, and setting up snitch lines. This of course alienates clientele when insisting they wear masks which cut off their oxygen and does nothing to keep them safe. Even things such as the 6-foot rule (particles can travel up to 20 meters) and washing hands (for 20 seconds is any more effective than 10 seconds) are arbitrary numbers, as again, there is no scientific evidence for these directives. So how about we go back to what we’ve been doing for over 100 years; let those who are sick stay home, let the rest of us build herd immunity to this less-than catastrophic virus, and let’s get our economy back on track…TODAY!!!!

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment